CSB releases update on investigation into explosions at Tennessee explosives-manufacturing facility
| By Scott Jenkins
The U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board (CSB; Washington, D.C.; www.csb.gov) today released an update on the agency’s ongoing investigation into the catastrophic October 10, 2025, explosions at the Accurate Energetic Systems, LLC (AES) explosives manufacturing facility in McEwen, Tennessee that killed 16 people and injured several others.
At approximately 7:47 a.m. on October 10, 2025, multiple catastrophic explosions occurred inside Building 602 at the AES site. On the day of the incident, AES was manufacturing commercial explosive products called cast boosters in the building. The massive explosions fatally injured 16 employees who were working in Building 602 and injured seven others who were near the building.
CSB Chairperson Steve Owens said, “This is one of the deadliest industrial incidents in our country in years. The CSB’s focus is to determine how and why this horrific event occurred and identify ways to help prevent a terrible tragedy like this from happening again.”
The explosions destroyed Building 602, propelling debris more than 700 feet from the structure and producing a blast that was reportedly felt over 20 miles away. According to the U.S. Geological Survey, the event registered as a 1.6-magnitude seismic event. At the time of the incident, approximately 24,600 pounds of explosive material were present in the building. The CSB estimates that about 23,000 pounds detonated, deflagrated, or burned during the event. Another 1,000 pounds of unexploded energetic material that had been launched from the building were recovered on-site and subsequently disposed of by burning it there.
AES manufactures a variety of explosive products used in military, aerospace, mining, avalanche control, and commercial demolition applications. The cast boosters being produced in Building 602 were explosive charges intended to be used to initiate larger detonations in industrial blasting applications. Building 602 consisted of a warehouse storing inert materials and an explosive product manufacturing area, separated by support facilities, including the supervisor offices, printing room, break room, bathrooms, and a room housing the boiler and other mechanical equipment. The explosive manufacturing area was two stories tall, with six kettles on the upper floor (mezzanine level), and three kettles on the ground level. Building 602 was not equipped with a sprinkler or deluge fire protection system.
Production of the cast booster involved a “melt-pour” process in which AES workers melted explosive materials in steam-jacketed kettles on the mezzanine level and mixed the materials with agitators. The molten explosive mixture was then transferred to ground level kettles, where AES workers removed the explosive mixture and poured it by hand into cardboard or plastic tubes, where the mixture cooled and solidified into cast booster charges. After the molten material solidified, AES packed the cast boosters into boxes — again by hand — and prepared them for shipment.
Large amounts of explosive materials were present throughout Building 602 on the day of the incident. In addition to the explosive material that was being actively processed, significant quantities of other explosive components and finished cast boosters were being cooled in fixtures, staged, or stored in various areas of the building at the time of the incident. All of these materials are classified as “high explosives,” meaning that they can detonate when exposed to sufficient heat, friction, impact, or shock.
On the morning of the incident, several AES operators were pouring highly explosive mixtures into 14-ounce and 11-pound cast boosters, while other employees were managing kettles, preparing tubes, removing solidified boosters, packaging finished products, and handling materials.
CSB Investigator-In-Charge Cruz Redman said, “The first detonation created a pressure wave that set off additional explosives throughout the building. The series of explosions resulted in fatal injuries to sixteen AES employees, injures to several others, the destruction of Building 602, and damage to multiple surrounding structures.”
The CSB’s investigation is ongoing as investigators continue to gather facts and analyze several key areas related to the October 10, 2025 fatal incident, including AES’s production process, the company’s process safety management programs for explosives, the design and operation of the kettles used in the melt-pour manufacturing process, AES’s safety practices and procedures, the sensitivity of the explosive materials being produced and handled, and industry safety guidance for commercial explosive manufacturing facilities.
The CSB is an independent, nonregulatory federal agency charged with investigating incidents and hazards that result, or may result, in the catastrophic release of extremely hazardous substances. The agency’s core mission activities include conducting incident investigations to identify root cause of releases; formulating preventive or mitigative recommendations based on investigation findings and advocating for their implementation; issuing reports containing the findings, conclusions, and recommendations arising from incident investigations; and conducting studies on chemical hazards.
The agency’s board members are appointed by the President subject to Senate confirmation. The Board does not issue citations or fines but makes safety recommendations to companies, industry organizations, labor groups, and regulatory agencies such as OSHA and EPA.
Featured Conference
November 9-11, 2026Irving Convention Center | Dallas, TX
Explore this topic and more — live at Clean Americas. Join environmental, health, safety, and emergency response professionals tackling the industry's most urgent hazards. View Conference Program →
When a major incident strikes, the people stepping into Incident Command aren't always the ones who trained for it. Engineers, operators, trades supervisors, and compliance specialists may suddenly find themselves filling Command and General Staff roles — not because they volunteered, but because the situation demands it. Panelists will share practical strategies for leading without positional authority, tools and frameworks that help personnel rapidly orient to ICS roles, and approaches for closing the gap between day-to-day job functions and emergency command readiness before the next incident makes it urgent.
Speaking
Scott Andrews (Trans Mountain Canada Inc., Manager Emergency Management)
Kelly Codlin , MSPH, CIH (Marathon Petroleum Company, Emergency Preparedness Director)
Nick Hickson (Texas A&M Engineering Extension Service (TEEX), Hazmat Training Manager)
Josh Dubach MSc, CEM (Onterris, Senior Response Management Consultant)
This session will examine produced water as the largest waste stream in the oil and gas industry and one of its most pressing emerging challenges. It will address the growing volumes of produced water, the increasing regulatory and public scrutiny of constituents such as PFAS, salts, and Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material (NORM), and the operational implications for management, treatment, reuse, and disposal. The discussion will also explore how operators, regulators, and communities are redefining approaches to produced water management in response to environmental, technical, and stakeholder pressures.
Speaking
Steve Pepper, Ph.D., (Onterris, Director of Response Management)
Charles Maguire (Railroad Commission of Texas, Advisor, Oil and Gas Division)
Prof. Shane Walker Ph.D. (Texas Produced Water Consortium, Director)
Ray Cheatham (Onterris, Energy Sector Leader)
This session will present a detailed case study of a large-scale lithium-ion battery fire response that extended over 12 months. Attendees will explore the hazards associated with thermal runaway events, the operational challenges of suppressing lithium battery fires, and the response strategies that proved effective in this prolonged incident. The
Drawing on insights from U.S. EPA Region 9 wildfire response efforts, the session will also highlight tactics such as hazard characterization, air monitoring and evaluation, and household hazardous waste collection and disposal. Participants will leave with a stronger understanding of the complexities involved in large-scale battery fire incidents and the critical factors to consider when planning and executing an effective response.
Speaking
Robert W. May PG (Clean Harbors, Senior Vice President, Branch Services and Sales)
Crosley Welch (Missouri Department of Natural Resources, State On-Scene Coordinator)
Samuel Cheek , CSP, RRPT (U.S. EPA, Region 6, Federal On-Scene Coordinator)
Christopher Myers (U.S. EPA, Region 9, Federal On-Scene Coordinator)
This session introduces use of remote sensing technologies to detect, characterize and monitor spills across marine and coastal environments. Discussion will highlight how tools can integrate into modern spill response workflows to improve safety and support data-driven decision making.
Speaking
James Hanzalik (Clean Gulf Associates, Vice-President)
Gordon Staples (MDA Space Ltd., Senior Radar Applications Scientist)
Grant Coolbaugh (Applied Research Associates / Ohmsett, Mechanical Engineer)
Speaking
Allyson Purcell MEP, CEM (ConocoPhillips, CMER Director)
Michael Delio (Maxum Petroleum, EHS & SECURITY MGR)
This session provides a practical, ground‑level introduction to the essential steps required after a battery undergoes a thermal event. We’ll break down how to assess site conditions, stabilize and prepare damaged cells or packs, select appropriate containment and packaging methods, and navigate the regulatory landscape that governs transport and disposal. The lecture emphasizes real‑world decision‑making, safety considerations, and compliance requirements, giving participants a clear framework they can apply immediately in field operations or emergency response planning.
Speaking
Mark Steadman (The Battery Network, Program Manager)