Last month, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC; www.sec.gov) finalized rules [1] that require registrants to disclose information about climate-related risks in their annual reports and registration statements. Recognizing that climate-related risks can affect a company’s business and financial position, the SEC rules are intended to give investors “more consistent, comparable and reliable information about the financial effects of climate-related risks on a registrant’s operations and how it manages those risks.” The new rules were first proposed two years ago, in March of 2022. Since that time, the SEC has considered more than 24,000 comment letters about the initial proposal before voting on, and passing a modified final ruling on March 6, 2024. The final rules will become effective 60 days after publication in the Federal Register, and compliance dates will be phased in, depending on the registrant’s filer status.
The final rules
The final rules require registrants to disclose information about climate-related risks that materially impact business strategy, operations or finances. Some disclosures related to severe weather events and other natural conditions are also required. In its Fact Sheet about the rules, the SEC states that the rules require the following, among other things, to be disclosed: “material climate-related risks; activities to mitigate or adapt to such risks; information about the registrant’s board of directors’ oversight of climate-related risks and management’s role in managing material climate-related risks; and information on any climate-related targets or goals that are material to the registrant’s business, results of operations, or financial condition.”
In addition, some registrants are required to disclose Scope 1 and Scope 2 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Scope 1 includes direct GHG emissions from sources that are controlled or owned by an organization. Examples are emissions from fuel combustion from boilers, furnaces and vehicles. Scope 2 refers to indirect GHG emissions, for example those that are associated with the purchase of electricity, steam, heat and cooling. Scope 3 emissions result from an organization’s upstream and downstream activities [2].
The proposed rules included requirements to report Scope 3 emissions, but this requirement was dropped in the final rules. In response to the final rules announcement, the American Chemistry Council (ACC; www.americanchemistry.com) states “While it will take some time to digest the lengthy rule package, we’re pleased that the Commission has removed the proposed requirement that companies quantify and report on ‘Scope 3’ emissions. ACC members supply critical chemistries used in the value chains of nearly every sector of the economy. This requirement posed unique challenges for the chemical sector while providing little value to investors.” The ACC also points out that its members already track Scope 1 and 2 emissions through its Responsible Care program, and it further states “ACC and its members are committed to being partners and solution providers in supporting a sensible path to a lower-emissions economy. We vigorously participated in this rulemaking and look forward to engaging on proposals with significant impacts for companies and sustainability efforts.” ■
Dorothy Lozowski, Editorial Director
1. The Enhancement and Standardization of Climate-Related Disclosures: Final Rules can be found at www.sec.gov
2. Source for the definition of emission scopes: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; www.epa.gov
Featured Conference
November 9-11, 2026Irving Convention Center | Dallas, TX
Explore this topic and more — live at Clean Americas. Join environmental, health, safety, and emergency response professionals tackling the industry's most urgent hazards. View Conference Program →
When a major incident strikes, the people stepping into Incident Command aren't always the ones who trained for it. Engineers, operators, trades supervisors, and compliance specialists may suddenly find themselves filling Command and General Staff roles — not because they volunteered, but because the situation demands it. Panelists will share practical strategies for leading without positional authority, tools and frameworks that help personnel rapidly orient to ICS roles, and approaches for closing the gap between day-to-day job functions and emergency command readiness before the next incident makes it urgent.
Speaking
Scott Andrews (Trans Mountain Canada Inc., Manager Emergency Management)
Kelly Codlin , MSPH, CIH (Marathon Petroleum Company, Emergency Preparedness Director)
Nick Hickson (Texas A&M Engineering Extension Service (TEEX), Hazmat Training Manager)
Josh Dubach MSc, CEM (Onterris, Senior Response Management Consultant)
This session will examine produced water as the largest waste stream in the oil and gas industry and one of its most pressing emerging challenges. It will address the growing volumes of produced water, the increasing regulatory and public scrutiny of constituents such as PFAS, salts, and Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material (NORM), and the operational implications for management, treatment, reuse, and disposal. The discussion will also explore how operators, regulators, and communities are redefining approaches to produced water management in response to environmental, technical, and stakeholder pressures.
Speaking
Steve Pepper, Ph.D., (Onterris, Director of Response Management)
Charles Maguire (Railroad Commission of Texas, Advisor, Oil and Gas Division)
Prof. Shane Walker Ph.D. (Texas Produced Water Consortium, Director)
Ray Cheatham (Onterris, Energy Sector Leader)
This session will present a detailed case study of a large-scale lithium-ion battery fire response that extended over 12 months. Attendees will explore the hazards associated with thermal runaway events, the operational challenges of suppressing lithium battery fires, and the response strategies that proved effective in this prolonged incident. The
Drawing on insights from U.S. EPA Region 9 wildfire response efforts, the session will also highlight tactics such as hazard characterization, air monitoring and evaluation, and household hazardous waste collection and disposal. Participants will leave with a stronger understanding of the complexities involved in large-scale battery fire incidents and the critical factors to consider when planning and executing an effective response.
Speaking
Robert W. May PG (Clean Harbors, Senior Vice President, Branch Services and Sales)
Crosley Welch (Missouri Department of Natural Resources, State On-Scene Coordinator)
Samuel Cheek , CSP, RRPT (U.S. EPA, Region 6, Federal On-Scene Coordinator)
Christopher Myers (U.S. EPA, Region 9, Federal On-Scene Coordinator)
This session introduces use of remote sensing technologies to detect, characterize and monitor spills across marine and coastal environments. Discussion will highlight how tools can integrate into modern spill response workflows to improve safety and support data-driven decision making.
Speaking
James Hanzalik (Clean Gulf Associates, Vice-President)
Gordon Staples (MDA Space Ltd., Senior Radar Applications Scientist)
Grant Coolbaugh (Applied Research Associates / Ohmsett, Mechanical Engineer)
Speaking
Allyson Purcell MEP, CEM (ConocoPhillips, CMER Director)
Michael Delio (Maxum Petroleum, EHS & SECURITY MGR)
This session provides a practical, ground‑level introduction to the essential steps required after a battery undergoes a thermal event. We’ll break down how to assess site conditions, stabilize and prepare damaged cells or packs, select appropriate containment and packaging methods, and navigate the regulatory landscape that governs transport and disposal. The lecture emphasizes real‑world decision‑making, safety considerations, and compliance requirements, giving participants a clear framework they can apply immediately in field operations or emergency response planning.
Speaking
Mark Steadman (The Battery Network, Program Manager)
Chemical Engineering
Disclosing climate risks
| By Dorothy Lozowski
Last month, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC; www.sec.gov) finalized rules [1] that require registrants to disclose information about climate-related risks in their annual reports and registration statements. Recognizing that climate-related risks can affect a company’s business and financial position, the SEC rules are intended to give investors “more consistent, comparable and reliable information about the financial effects of climate-related risks on a registrant’s operations and how it manages those risks.” The new rules were first proposed two years ago, in March of 2022. Since that time, the SEC has considered more than 24,000 comment letters about the initial proposal before voting on, and passing a modified final ruling on March 6, 2024. The final rules will become effective 60 days after publication in the Federal Register, and compliance dates will be phased in, depending on the registrant’s filer status.
The final rules
The final rules require registrants to disclose information about climate-related risks that materially impact business strategy, operations or finances. Some disclosures related to severe weather events and other natural conditions are also required. In its Fact Sheet about the rules, the SEC states that the rules require the following, among other things, to be disclosed: “material climate-related risks; activities to mitigate or adapt to such risks; information about the registrant’s board of directors’ oversight of climate-related risks and management’s role in managing material climate-related risks; and information on any climate-related targets or goals that are material to the registrant’s business, results of operations, or financial condition.”
In addition, some registrants are required to disclose Scope 1 and Scope 2 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Scope 1 includes direct GHG emissions from sources that are controlled or owned by an organization. Examples are emissions from fuel combustion from boilers, furnaces and vehicles. Scope 2 refers to indirect GHG emissions, for example those that are associated with the purchase of electricity, steam, heat and cooling. Scope 3 emissions result from an organization’s upstream and downstream activities [2].
The proposed rules included requirements to report Scope 3 emissions, but this requirement was dropped in the final rules. In response to the final rules announcement, the American Chemistry Council (ACC; www.americanchemistry.com) states “While it will take some time to digest the lengthy rule package, we’re pleased that the Commission has removed the proposed requirement that companies quantify and report on ‘Scope 3’ emissions. ACC members supply critical chemistries used in the value chains of nearly every sector of the economy. This requirement posed unique challenges for the chemical sector while providing little value to investors.” The ACC also points out that its members already track Scope 1 and 2 emissions through its Responsible Care program, and it further states “ACC and its members are committed to being partners and solution providers in supporting a sensible path to a lower-emissions economy. We vigorously participated in this rulemaking and look forward to engaging on proposals with significant impacts for companies and sustainability efforts.” ■
1. The Enhancement and Standardization of Climate-Related Disclosures: Final Rules can be found at www.sec.gov
2. Source for the definition of emission scopes: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; www.epa.gov
Featured Conference
When a major incident strikes, the people stepping into Incident Command aren't always the ones who trained for it. Engineers, operators, trades supervisors, and compliance specialists may suddenly find themselves filling Command and General Staff roles — not because they volunteered, but because the situation demands it. Panelists will share practical strategies for leading without positional authority, tools and frameworks that help personnel rapidly orient to ICS roles, and approaches for closing the gap between day-to-day job functions and emergency command readiness before the next incident makes it urgent.
This session will examine produced water as the largest waste stream in the oil and gas industry and one of its most pressing emerging challenges. It will address the growing volumes of produced water, the increasing regulatory and public scrutiny of constituents such as PFAS, salts, and Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material (NORM), and the operational implications for management, treatment, reuse, and disposal. The discussion will also explore how operators, regulators, and communities are redefining approaches to produced water management in response to environmental, technical, and stakeholder pressures.
This session will present a detailed case study of a large-scale lithium-ion battery fire response that extended over 12 months. Attendees will explore the hazards associated with thermal runaway events, the operational challenges of suppressing lithium battery fires, and the response strategies that proved effective in this prolonged incident. The
Drawing on insights from U.S. EPA Region 9 wildfire response efforts, the session will also highlight tactics such as hazard characterization, air monitoring and evaluation, and household hazardous waste collection and disposal. Participants will leave with a stronger understanding of the complexities involved in large-scale battery fire incidents and the critical factors to consider when planning and executing an effective response.
This session introduces use of remote sensing technologies to detect, characterize and monitor spills across marine and coastal environments. Discussion will highlight how tools can integrate into modern spill response workflows to improve safety and support data-driven decision making.
This session provides a practical, ground‑level introduction to the essential steps required after a battery undergoes a thermal event. We’ll break down how to assess site conditions, stabilize and prepare damaged cells or packs, select appropriate containment and packaging methods, and navigate the regulatory landscape that governs transport and disposal. The lecture emphasizes real‑world decision‑making, safety considerations, and compliance requirements, giving participants a clear framework they can apply immediately in field operations or emergency response planning.