Chementator Briefs
Ultrathin membrane Researchers led by professors Hideto Matsuyama and Tomohisa…
Focus on Sensors
Wireless transmitters save on level sensor installation Reduce the cost…

Comment PDF Processing & Handling

How to design agitators for desired process response

By Richard Hicks, Jerry Morton and John Fenic, Chemineer, Inc. |

Effective agitation of fluids for blending and motion requires a detailed analysis of capacity, viscosity and dynamic response for the fluid system, in order to find power and shaft speed of the agitator and corresponding sized of the turbine impeller.

Our purpose in this article will be to emphasize a design procedure for practical problems in the chemical process industries involving blending and motion.

The information presented here may be used for the design of turbine agitators in applications ranging from storage vessels requiring very little agitation to critical reactors needing a great deal of it.

To understand the need for an organized approach to design, we will follow steps shown in the logic flow diagram of Figure 1 in deciding on an agitator for blending-and motion-problems. This illustration represents a portion of the overall logic flow diagram originally presented in part one of this series. We will review the mechanical design of drives, shafts and seals, and economic evaluations, in future articles of the series. Here, we will limit our discussion to procedures for blending and motion up to and including design of the impeller system.

Classification of problem

The design procedure for blending and motion applies to agitation problems where fluids behave as a single phase and where a predictable level of fluid motion must occur. For example, a typical blending problem may require the mixing to uniformity of fluids having dissimilar viscosity, density or concentration. On the other hand, a fluid motion problem may require improved convective heat transfer coefficients to facilitate heat removal from a reacting fluid.

The agitator design logic for blending and motion also applies to some two-phase systems that exhibit single-face behavior. An example would be fluids containing a very small concentration of solids and having very slow settling velocities.

It is equally important to state where the blending-and-motion logic is not applicable. The procedures in this article do not apply to problems such as immiscible liquid-liquid dispersion, or the blending of highly non-Newtonian fluids.

Following the design logic of the Figure 1, we will analyze each of the three components under the heading “magnitude of the agitation problem.”

For the rest of this article, which was first published by Chemical Engineering  in 1976, please fill out the form below. [gated]DOWNLOAD NOW[/gated]

Related Content
Beyond Simple Mixing
Five different examples are presented in which specialty mixers are used to perform tasks more efficiently than conventional approaches Specialty…
Liquid Mixing in Stirred Tanks
A method of quantifying mixing according to a mixing index is presented. This index can evaluate and predict mixing intensity…

Chemical Engineering publishes FREE eletters that bring our original content to our readers in an easily accessible email format about once a week.
Subscribe Now
Improving chemical production processes with IIoT and AI technologies
New filtration technology for highly corrosive media
PTA production: Lowering OPEX without compromising on quality
Sure that zero means zero in your zero-liquid discharge (ZLD) process?
How separation processes profit from Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) solutions

View More