I D
× COMMENTARYIN THE NEWSNEWSFRONTSCHEMENTATOR + Show More BUSINESS NEWSTECHNICAL & PRACTICALFEATURE REPORTFACTS AT YOUR FINGERTIPSTECHNOLOGY PROFILEENGINEERING PRACTICEENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEREQUIPMENT & SERVICESFOCUS
Focus on Valves
Safe combustible-dust-explosion isolation Isolation is essential to protect adjoining system…
NEW PRODUCTS + Show More

Comment

Storage Tanks: Snapshots of Failures, Damages and Inspections

By Ana Benz |

Lessons learned from past failures provide insight and know-how needed toinspect and operate storage tanks reliably

Storage tanks are a common sight at many facilities of the chemical process industries (CPI). Tanks are part of our everyday life and they appear deceivingly simple. However, they require a great deal of know-how and specialized knowledge to operate reliably. Otherwise, failures can occur.

Some tank failures are well known by the public, as the following examples show:

  • In 1919, an accident involving a distilling tank with molasses killed 21 persons in Massachusetts [1]
  • In the 1984 Bhopal tragedy, people were exposed to methyl isocyanate gas, resulting in 3,787 or more deaths [2]
  • In 2001, when a sulfuric-acid storage-tank failure in Delaware City, Delaware [3] resulted in one person’s death, eight others injured and significant damage to aquatic life

Although the damage and failures discussed in this article have had less impact than these well-known examples, they underline that a great deal of know-how and attention to detail are needed to operate storage tanks reliably. The tank incidents presented are the following:

  • Roof challenges
  • Welding the drain nozzle in large steel tanks
  • Crack in the floor-to-wall joint
  • Know-how for installing fiber-reinforced plastic septic tanks
  • Non-intrusive non-destructive tests

Roof challenges

Fixed-roof tanks are designed to fail at the shell-to-roof weld. A fixed-roof tank exploded while personnel were refurbishing equipment upstream of the tank. The roof was torn off and one of the persons working upstream was severely injured.

The work upstream had resulted in a pressure surge. The vents were supposed to allow the pressure to blow off, but the sudden pressurization was such that the undersized vent could not transfer gases quickly enough. The failed tank roof-to-shell weld had a torn, overloaded appearance. It appeared to be free of pre-existing flaws. The pressure at which the roof separated was estimated to be 0.6 psi. This value appeared to be low, but many tanks are constructed according to API Standard 650 “Welded Tanks for Oil Storage.” Such tanks intentionally have a weak roof-to-shell seam so that if an internal overpressure from an explosion or a similar situation develops, the design allows the roof to separate from the vertical shell to prevent failure of the bottom seams and the tank’s “rocketing” or propelling upward [4].

Fixed-roof condition after removing insulation. After removing the insulation from a roof, inspection personnel identified numerous through-thickness openings in the roof (Figure 1).

Lesson learned about fixed-roof tanks. Do not walk on the roof without significant hazard diminishing strategies.

Welding the drain nozzle in large tanks

During hydrostatic testing, an NPS 3 (nominal pipe size) tank drain nozzle leaked. The tank was fabricated to hold diesel fuel. The drain nozzle had one fillet weld joining it to the shell and another joining it to a reinforcing pad (repad), which is a plate formed to the shape of the tank or vessel around a nozzle for extra strength. The welds had multiple cracks, porosity and non-fusion, as can be seen in Figures 2 and 3.

Figure 2. Cracks were observed in this tank shell-to-nozzle weld


Figure 3. A closeup of the tank shell-to-nozzle fillet weld crack shown in Figure 2

Lesson learned about welding the drain nozzle in steel tanks. Tanks are welded from the floor up. This means that access to this location (the drain) for welding is challenging. To prevent leaks, the welding passes can be deposited in multiple stages to prevent the formation of continuous leak paths. The hold times for the hydrostatic test should meet and exceed the standard requirements. Fluorescent liquid penetrant could make identifying a minute leak easier.

Figure 4. Shown here is the tank shell-to-bottom joint. Note the occurrence of soil settlement and tank wall distortion


Figure 5. Cracks of the tank wall of Figure 4 are identified with magnetic particles

Crack in the floor-to-wall joint

A fertilizer service carbon-steel tank floor developed cracks in the tank wall to tank bottom joint, as shown in Figures 4 and 5. The cracks had the following characteristics:

  • The cracks developed in the cross-section with the highest stresses in the storage tank. Hydrostatic and welding residual stresses are maximum on this joint
  • The cracks had some oxides/corrosion products (see Figures 6 and 7)
  • The cracks were intergranular

These characteristics are consistent with the cracks being due to nitrate stress corrosion cracking (SCC). Additional stresses from the soil settlement under the tank resulted in distortion of the tank wall and floor. These stresses further contributed to the cracks forming.

Figure 6. For the same tank shown in Figure 4, this metallographic cross-section of the tank floor shows Intergranular cracks with oxides/corrosion products


Figure 7. Another view of the metallographic cross-section of the tank floor (Figure 6), which shows Intergranular cracks (2% Nital etch)

Lesson learned about the tank floor-to-wall joint. Soil settlement needs to be monitored, and this critical joint (for carbon steels) needs inspection techniques, such as magnetic particles or eddy current, or both.

 

Fiber-reinforced plastic septic tanks

New, deep-underground fiber-reinforced plastic (FRP) spiral-wound tanks had water ingress while the ground was being excavated. Prior to the inward leaks, the grade for the deep underground tanks had experienced a sudden increase in water level due to rain. The rain resulted in the tanks lifting partially (due to buoyancy) from their excavated installation grade.

Figure 8. This septic tank’s inside diameter was oval. The internals had separated from the shell

Examining the tanks from the inside, the shape was oval (Figure 8). Also, many of the joints were “whitened.” “Whitening” can develop when FRP is subjected to localized stresses (Figure 9). These damages suggested the tanks had experienced excessive compressive displacement during their partial lift.

Figure 9. For the same septic tank of Figure 8, many of the inside joints had whitened — an indication of localized stress

The summer excavation held several surprises, as follows:

  • The soil surrounding the tanks had 0.3 m × 3 m × 0.1 m chunks of ice (Figure 10). Some of these ice chunks had been pressing against the tank shell. FRP is prone to cracking when subjected to localized compressive loads
  • The day before the author left the site, an intermittent underground stream was noted a couple of meters below the ground level. The flow was directed at the tanks and would have eroded the ground and support for the tanks, once installed

Figure 10. During a summer excavation, large chunks of ice were identified surrounding the septic tank of Figure 8

The damaged tanks were replaced. Soil, in accordance to strict (and necessary) installation guidelines, was used to install the replacement tanks. The flow of the underground stream was diverted away from the tanks. The replacement tanks were installed without further surprises.

Lesson learned about installing FRP septic tanks. Buried FRP tanks require special installation practices heralded by their suppliers. Thorough evaluations of the soil conditions, underground water, grading and installation are musts.

 

Non-intrusive non-destructive tests

Acoustic emission (AE) testing of FRP and of ammonia tanks.AE tests of FRP and ammonia tanks provide volumetric tests of shells of the tanks while in service. Entry is not required, avoiding the potentially damaging process of shutting and exposing the tanks to air (when ammonia tanks can develop stress cracks) and thermal stresses for ammonia service. The tests aim to detect and locate areas of concern. Figure 11 shows tank bottom pits identified with acoustic emission. Follow-up inspection with a complementary non-destructive testing (NDT) method is needed to identify and size any AE indications for ammonia steel tanks. FRP tanks require visual follow-up.

Figure 11. Tank floor pits are identified with acoustic emission non-destructive testing

This technology was proven and implemented by Monsanto personnel. As stated by the author’s colleague, Martin Peacock (now retired), “the initial round of testing led to shutting down several tanks for inspection and repair of fabrication defects detected by the AE test. However, once the tanks were repaired, no further inspections were required. One tank in the U.S. has been in continuous service with regular AE testing since 1984. This tank is tested every five years with the last carried out in June 2011 with no indication of service related damage to the shell” [5].

Lesson learned about non-intrusive AE testing of ammonia tanks. Used wisely, these tests can keep FRP and ammonia tanks operating reliably without causing inspection-related tank damage.

 

Robotics

Today, we are performing robotic inspections to monitor the thickness of tank shells and roofs. Robotics are also used to inspect water tanks. The future holds the promise of robotics being used for tank thickness, visual and various other internal inspections for multiple other services (Figure 12). This would reduce the need for personnel to enter confined spaces and the time and budgets needed for emptying and storing tank contents elsewhere. However, cleaning and navigational challenges are today the obstacles that need to be overcome.

storage tanks

Figure 12. Using robotics for visual and coating inspections can reduce the need for personnel to enter confined spaces

References

1. Electronic source: www.historytoday.com/archive/sticky-tragedy-boston-molasses-disaster, accessed November 3, 2019.

3. U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board Investigation Report, Refinery Incident Report No. 2001-05-I-De-issue date: October 2002, available electronically at www.csb.gov, last accessed, November 3, 2019.

4. Craig, H. Shelley, “Storage Tank Fires: Is your Department Prepared?” Fire Engineering University, available electronically at: https://1pdf.net/storage-tank-fires-fire-engineering_585948fce12e891e7ce5b4e2, last accessed, November 3, 2019.

5. Private communication.

 

Acknowledgements

The author is thankful for the great collaboration from many of her colleagues and customers who have allowed her to show their images. Special thanks to Chris Bishop, Martin Clements, Dustin Loveland, Dexin Lu, Martin Peacock and Marten Sales.

 

Author

Ana Benz is the chief engineer at IRISNDT (5311 86 th Street, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6E 5T8; Phone: 780-577-4481; Email: ana.benz@irisndt.com). She has worked for 22 years as a corrosion, failure and inspection specialist. Her expertise includes inspections and organizing plant inspection projects using advanced inspection technologies. Benz has worked extensively for the chemical process industries, in petrochemical plants, fertilizer plants and nickel refineries around the world, as well as oil-and-gas production sites. She holds a degree in materials engineering from the University Simon Bolivar in Venezuela and also holds an M.S. in materials engineering from the University of British Columbia. She has several Canadian General Standards Board (CGSB) NDT certificates, as well as API 510 certifications and Level 3 certification from the CWB Group. Benz was a member of the NACE Edmonton Executive chapter for 15 years, and before that, participated in various capacities for the Edmonton Chapter of the Canadian Welding Institute.

Related Content
Letters
Atmospheric Storage Tanks This refers to the [Engineering Practice] article “Designing Atmospheric Storage Tanks” [March 2017, pp. 77–82]. It is…

Chemical Engineering publishes FREE eletters that bring our original content to our readers in an easily accessible email format about once a week.
Subscribe Now
Improving chemical production processes with IIoT and AI technologies
New filtration technology for highly corrosive media
PTA production: Lowering OPEX without compromising on quality
Sure that zero means zero in your zero-liquid discharge (ZLD) process?
How separation processes profit from Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) solutions

View More

Live chat by BoldChat